Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Dreamer v. Mason

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2010No. 93949Published

1Dissent

Sean C. Gallagher, Administrative Judge,

dissenting.

{¶ 54} I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. While I empathize with the position in which relators were placed and do not fully condone the actions of the prosecutor’s office, I do not believe relators are entitled to mandamus relief under existing law.

{¶ 55} In order for relators to establish a clear legal right to have legal counsel appointed at the expense of the county, they must show that they are entitled to this relief under the applicable statutes. R.C. 309.09(A) requires the prosecuting attorney to defend all actions to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Husted v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Leber v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Stamps v. Automatic Data Processing BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API