Legal Opinion

London v. Curlee

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1960No. 13624PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Plaintiff, Doyle London, sued C. L. Curlee for the enforcement of a warranty Curlee made on fertilizer he sold plaintiff. The case was tried before the court and after judgment for defendant the court made findings of all material facts against the plaintiff. Plaintiff urges that the undisputed evidence supports his contention that defendant warranted that the difference between the value of production on cotton and grain grown on the fertilized ground would be sufficient to pay all costs of the fertilizer and that the plaintiff complied with the contract. The increased…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dugan v. TroutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Fetzer v. HaralsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Adams v. CrittendenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Elanco Products Company v. Akin-TunnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Bass v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Processteel, Inc. v. Mosley MacHinery Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. Venie v. South Central Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API