Legal Opinion

Fetzer v. Haralson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from District Court, Matagorda County; Wells Thompson, Judge. Action by William Fetzer against E. Har-alson. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in error, as assignee of Fetzer Co., filed suit against defendant in error on May 20, 1910, to recover a balance of $1,212.58, besides interest and attorney's fees, alleged to be due for certain farm implements known as Rice Drills or Seeders and attachments, sold and delivered to defendant in error in January, 1907. The plaintiff, in his first amended original petition, on which he went to trial, alleged that on January 4, 1907, defendant executed a certain written order to Fetzer Co. for 20 drills and 20 gang press wheels and a lot of repairs to be used by defendant for sale to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wright v. DavenportTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. J. I. Case Plow Works v. Niles & Scott Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co. v. E. B. Hall & Keating Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Cosgrove v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Elanco Products Company v. Akin-TunnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Bass v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Dillard v. ClutterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API