Legal Opinion
Oglebay Norton Co. v. Universal Refractories Corp.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided June 11, 1969No. 65-C-310PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
This action for patent infringement arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281 et seq. The jurisdiction of this court is based on Title 28 U.S.C. § 1338, and *1107venue lies in this district by virtue of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b).
This matter was tried to the court on February 5, 1968. In addition thereto, the court and counsel visited a steel mill in Gary, Indiana, for the purpose of familiarizing the court with the pouring of steel molds and the use of the hot top in conjunction with the commercial product of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Brooks Walker v. General Motors Corporation and Les Vogel Chevrolet CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Artmoore Co. v. Dayless Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Copease Manufacturing Co. v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Car Wash Systems, Inc. v. Danco, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1972
- Andis Clipper Co. v. Oster Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979