Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. Cronk
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Eeplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The defendant, on the 18th day of June, 1887, contracted in writing to purchase of one William L. Jenks the N. W. £ of S. W. £ of section 19, township 7 N., range 16 E. The contract was in the usual printed form, and contained a covenant on the part of the defendant that he would not commit, or suffer any other person to commit, any waste or damage to said lands or appurtenances, except for firewood or otherwise for his own use, or while clearing off the lands for cultivation in the ordinary manner. Immediately after entering upon *51the lands he erected a small dwelling-house thereon, and lived…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morrison v. BerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Hinkley & Egery Iron Co. v. BlackSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
- Kingsley v. McFarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889
3Cited by11 opinions
- Workman v. HenrieUtah Supreme Court · 1928
- Williamson v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Burpee v. Athens Production Credit Asso.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Kennedy v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Page v. UrickWashington Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.