Legal Opinion
People v. Silver
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 11, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The information charged the defendant with the commission of the crime of bookmaking as defined in section 986 of the Penal Law, but failed to allege that the offense charged did not occur on an authorized running or trotting track. After a trial before the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, New York County, the defendant was found guilty as charged, and a date set for sentence. On the day of sentence the defendant’s attorney moved in arrest of judgment, on the ground that the information on which this defendant was convicted did not state facts to constitute a crime, because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. . StedekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- People v. . WiechersNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- People v. TarlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- People v. Lee FoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- People v. BerlowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LeibyNew York City Court · 1945
- People v. FranzoniCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
- People v. RubensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- People v. BrunoNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. EstreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.