Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. 305 East 40th Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1993PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered on or about April 20, 1992, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, the cross motion is denied and the complaint is reinstated, without costs.

Apartment 3-0 at 305 East 40th Street became available when the record owner filed for bankruptcy and the bank, which held liens on the apartment, decided not to cure the owner’s maintenance default and take over the apartment. The plaintiff, Murray Ackerman, a resident…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Levy v. Young Adult Institute, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Brasseur v. SperanzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Barbour v. KnechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Willens v. 2720 Wisconsin Avenue Cooperative Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. L. Magarian & Co. v. Timberland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API