Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Dann v. Bulgartabac Holding Group, 07ap-177 (12-18-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2007No. 07AP-177PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant, Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann ("the state"), filed this appeal seeking reversal of a judgment by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion to dismiss of appellee, Bulgartabac Holding Group ("Bulgartabac" or "appellee"), for lack of personal jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court's decision.
{¶ 2} This case arises from litigation in which the state of Ohio sued a number of major tobacco companies seeking reimbursement for expenditures made by the state to treat Ohio citizens suffering from tobacco-related illnesses.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Goldstein v. ChristiansenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Kentucky Oaks Mall Co. v. Mitchell's Formal Wear, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- U.S. Sprint Communications Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Mr. K's Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Greene v. WhitesideOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State ex rel. Cordray v. Makedonija Tabak 2000Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Focuspoint International, Inc. v. BaldeoDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022