Legal Opinion

Tennessee Copper & Chemical Corp. v. Martin

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 25, 1932No. 4087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AVIS, District Judge.

The bill in this ease prays for the assignment and transfer of the right, title, and interest of defendant in certain inventions of defendant, which, it is alleged, belong to the plaintiff, because of a certain claimed contract of employment between the parties, plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff alleges and claims it has proven that the defendant, a consulting engineer with inventive ability, was employed by it in research work to recover phosphate rock from other mineral with which it commingled, so as to make such recovery profitable, and to avoid the processes then in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Conway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. Conway v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Wege v. Safe-Cabinet Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  5. No-Leak-O Piston Ring Co. v. ChandleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeJong v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. Velsicol Corp. v. HymanIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. De Jong v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. Gilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API