Legal Opinion

Burleson Baker v. Sugarland Industries

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1922No. 8164. [fn*]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from! District Court, Fort Bend County; M. S. Munson, Judge. Action by Sugarland Industries against Burleson & Baker. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

In this appeal Burleson & Baker complain of a judgment for $5,487 rendered against them below as damages to the sugar company for their breach of the following contract with it:

“Contract No. 9333.
“Imperial Sugar Company, Sugar Land, Texas.
“Sugar Land, Texas, April 26, 1920. “Broker IBCO-FML.
“Confirming sale as manufacturers to Burle-son & Baker, Eagle Pass, Texas. 720 bags, subject to' delay. Shipment as wanted within June, 1920. Price basis, 27c. Terms: Net 30 days, or 2 per cent, discount seven days after arrival at destination. Positively no discount will be allowed if remittance is made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tufts v. T. L. Lawrence & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Diamond State Iron Co. v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burleson & Baker v. Sugarland IndustriesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Strickland Transportation Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Strickland Transportation Co. v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Vise v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API