Legal Opinion

Vise v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1952No. 2991Published

1Opinion

On Appellant’s Motion For Rehearing.

TIREY, Justice.

Point 1 in appellant’s motion for rehearing is: “The Court of Civil Appeals erred in failing to hold that the furnishing of tank cars by the buyer-appellee was a condition precedent to the duty of the seller-appellant to deliver oil free on board into such cars and, the buyer having alleged but having offered no evidence of performance of such condition, the seller’s promise to deliver never was activated into a duty and, 'a fortiori, never was breached.”

Our view is that Point 1 assumes a factual situation contra to' the undisputed evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Security Banking & Investment Co. v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Culp v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  4. San Jacinto Oil Co. v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Von Harten & Clark, Inc. v. NevelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API