Dolata v. Berthelet Fuel & Supply Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Upon our review of the proof introduced on the trial it is evident that the court was fully warranted in stating in its written decision that there were duly established certain facts of which it suffices on this appeal to note the following:
Plaintiffs own and reside in homes south of and immediately across the street from premises used by defendant as its coal and building-material yard. The yard is on the southern fringe of an industrial business district in which there are to the north, some manufacturing plants and locomotives on railroad tracks and in a roundhouse, which emit smoke and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cunningham v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Hasslinger v. Village of HartlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Pennoyer v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Greene v. NunnemacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Rogers v. John Week Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sohns v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Jost v. Dairyland Power CooperativeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Kellogg v. Village of ViolaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.