United States v. Booth
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by the military judge sitting alone of conspiring with another sailor to commit larceny by force in violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 880, and of the robbery of currency and a money order totalling $151.00 from a Marine private in violation of Article 122, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 922. On appeal, the appellant contends that the Government failed to prove his guilt of these two charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
This case illustrates several well-established principles of the law regarding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. MatiasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. McCullahUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. LayneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. HenthornNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. GonzalezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- United States v. McMonagleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992