Legal Opinion

Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. Boykin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 2007No. 4262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORT, J.:

Paul L. Erickson appeals the circuit court’s order denying enforcement of a North Carolina default judgment based on the foreign court’s lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.

FACTS

James and Mona Boykin (the Boykins) are residents of Horry County, South Carolina and the parents of an autistic son. In 1999, they hired Erickson, a North Carolina attorney licensed to practice law in South Carolina, to represent them in an action against the Horry County School District for failure to provide certain services to their son.

Erickson represented the Boykins at a four-day administrative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hamilton v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Moss v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  5. Security Credit Leasing, Inc. v. ArmalyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. BoykinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Law Firm of Paul L. Erickson, P.A. v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API