Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Black v. Eagleson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1919PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original application for writ of mandate. The indebtedness contemplated in art. 8, sec. 1, of the constitution is indebtedness or liabilities in excess of the revenue provided for the fiscal year or previously provided, as distinguished, from obligations to pay money from taxes already levied or in process of collection.

Read the full summary

Original application for writ of mandate. The indebtedness contemplated in art. 8, sec. 1, of the constitution is indebtedness or liabilities in excess of the revenue provided for the fiscal year or previously provided, as distinguished, from obligations to pay money from taxes already levied or in process of collection. (36 Cyc. 884; Stein v. Morrison, 9 Ida. 426, 75 Pac. 246; State v. Medbery, 7 Ohio St. 522; Feil v. City of Coeur d’Alene, 23 Ida. 32, 129 Pac. 643, 43 L. R. A., N. S., 1095; State v. McCauley, 15 Cal. 429; People v. Pacheco, 27 Cal. 175; State ex rel. Ash v. Parkinson, 5…

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

Relator states in his application for a writ of mandate that he is attorney general and the defendant is treasurer of the state of Idaho; that the state board of examiners, on April 30, 1919, by resolution regularly adopted, ordered and directed the issuance and sale of treasury notes of the par value of one million two hundred and fifty thousand dollar's, as authorized by Sess. Laws 1919, chap. 94, p. 346; that there is outstanding in taxes levied for 1919, for general state purposes, payable into the general fund of the state treasury, in 1920, the sum of two million dollars in addition to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stein v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Rhea v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Bryan v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Ash v. ParkinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1869

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. State ex rel. Rankin v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Moore v. BanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. In Re State Treasury Note IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Bond Com'n v. ALL TAXPAYERSSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API