Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Appeal of Butte County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1986No. 14553Published

1DissentFosheim, Chief Justice

The majority opinion appropriately finds that irrigability of land is a relevant consideration when assessing agriculture land values. However, I would conclude that the trial court clearly erred in ruling that the County must assess appellees’ land values using only dryland tables.

Butte County requested and received an Attorney General’s opinion on the propriety of considering the irrigation factor in land assessments. Assessment of Irrigated Agricultural Land, Op. Att’y Gen. No. 80-36, p. 202 (May 12, 1980). The Attorney General ruled “the Butte County Assessor is correct in considering the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yadco, Inc. v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mortenson v. County of StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Widdoss v. EsmaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re the Appeal From the Refusal of the State Board of Equalization to Hear the Appeal of the Lake Poinsett Area Development Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Tulare Independent School District No. 36 v. Crandon School District No. 17South Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API