Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from several consolidated cases raising identical issues. Respondents State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) and Valley Forge Insurance Company, (CNA Group) (“Valley Forge”) provide automobile insurance for four individuals (hereinafter “renters”) who each rented vehicles from appellant Alamo Rent-A-Car (“Alamo”). The State Farm and Valley Forge policies provide that their coverage of a rental vehicle is secondary to other applicable coverage. Alamo’s rental contract with each of the renters provides that its coverage is secondary to the…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Travelers Insurance v. LopezNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Yosemite Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- Salas v. Allstate Rent-A-Car, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Hertz Corp. v. Robineau, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Hall v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Budget Rent-A-Car v. STATE FARM AUTO INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- New Hampshire Indem v. Budget Rent-A-CarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.