Legal Opinion

Griffith Amusement Co. v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 28, 1936No. 8533PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

The controlling question in this appeal is whether an advertising plan, known as “Bank Nite,” operated by appellant (a motion picture theater owner), constituted a lottery.

The appeal is from a temporary injunction granted to appellee, a competitor of appellant.

The facts pertinent to the above question follow: Appellant operated two theaters in the town of Brady, named, respectively, the Brady and the Palace. On each Thursday night at 9 o’clock at the Brady appellant conducted a drawing by lot of a cash prize of $25. Chances to the drawing were distributed as follows:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yellow-Stone Kit v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  5. State v. HundlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Little River Theatre Corp. v. State Ex Rel. HodgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. State v. Socony Mobil Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. American Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  5. Pitman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API