Legal Opinion
Martin v. Williams
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 10, 1994No. S93G1090PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sears-Collins, Justice.
The appellee obtained a judgment against the appellants on a dental malpractice claim, and the appellants filed a motion styled as both a motion for new trial and a motion to set aside the judgment. The trial court denied the motion, and the appellants filed a direct appeal to the Court of Appeals. Citing State Farm &c. Co. v. Yancey, 258 Ga. 802 (375 SE2d 39) (1989), the Court of Appeals by order ruled that the denial of both the motion for new trial and the motion to set aside the judgment had to be appealed under the application requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35, 1 even…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. KlemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Fabe v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Pillow v. SeymourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Bank of Cumming v. MoseleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Cotton v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kuriatnyk v. KuriatnykSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Dolinger v. DriverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Grogan v. City of DawsonvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- MMT ENTERPRISES, INC. v. CullarsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Langlands v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.