State v. Watley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.
The state appeals the dismissal of criminal drug charges against respondent. The district court ruled that double jeopardy barred the criminal prosecution because of a prior civil administrative forfeiture of property found in proximity to the controlled substances seized from respondent. We do not reach the issue of whether the civil forfeiture here constituted punishment upon which double jeopardy may apply. Instead, we reverse, because there was no previous judgment of forfeiture upon which jeopardy could attach.
FACTS
On August 12, 1994, two police officers…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999