Legal Opinion

State v. Watley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1995No. C4-95-1107PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.

The state appeals the dismissal of criminal drug charges against respondent. The district court ruled that double jeopardy barred the criminal prosecution because of a prior civil administrative forfeiture of property found in proximity to the controlled substances seized from respondent. We do not reach the issue of whether the civil forfeiture here constituted punishment upon which double jeopardy may apply. Instead, we reverse, because there was no previous judgment of forfeiture upon which jeopardy could attach.

FACTS

On August 12, 1994, two police officers…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  2. State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API