State v. LeRoy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLTAN, Judge.**
Appellant argues that double jeopardy-bars her retrial on a fifth-degree assault charge on which the jury voted to acquit before declaration of a mistrial. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Susan Leroy was tried oh one charge of disorderly conduct and one charge of fifth-degree assault. After receiving the verdict forms from the jury foreperson, the trial court discovered that the jury had received a copy of the amended complaint. Nonetheless, the court read the verdict forms aloud, pronouncing appellant guilty of disorderly conduct but not guilty of fifth-degree assault, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. WatleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LeroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999