Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE ^HEARING COMMISSION
COVINGTON, Judge.
The Kansas City Royals Baseball Corporation (the corporation) seeks review of the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) that the corporation is not entitled to a refund of use tax paid on certain promotional items and Kansas City Royals yearbooks. The AHC held that the corporation was not entitled to any exclusion or exemption from use tax pursuant to sections 144.605(13), RSMo 1994, or 144.615(6), RSMo 1994, on either the promotional items or the yearbooks. The decision of the AHC is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sipco, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- King v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Aladdin's Castle, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Dean MacHinery Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Bolivar Road News, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- President Casino, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Dyno Nobel, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Brinker Missouri, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- DI Supply I, LLC and its Individual Members v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.