Legal Opinion

Aladdin's Castle, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 20, 1996No. 78323PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLSTEIN, Chief Justice.

The Director of Revenue appeals a decision by the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC) holding that Aladdin’s Castle, Inc., (Aladdin) was not liable for use tax on prizes awarded to customers at Aladdin’s twelve arcades in Missouri. The question presented involves the construction of §§ 144.605(13), 144.610, and 144.615. 1 The decision of the AHC is affirmed.

I

Aladdin’s customers purchase tokens, which are deposited into machines to play arcade games. Aladdin pays a sales tax on the gross receipts from the sale of the tokens. For some games, tickets are awarded that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sipco, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. King v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. R & M Enterprises, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brinker Missouri, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. President Casino, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API