Dyno Nobel, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.
Dyno Nobel, Inc. (“Dyno”) seeks review of the decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission (the “Commission”) denying its claim for a refund of use taxes paid to the Director of Revenue (the “Director”). Dyno adequately presented its claim for a use tax refund, use taxes cannot be assessed against the intrastate transactions at issue, and the Director cannot claim the use taxes paid as sales taxes because no assessment for sales tax was made. The decision is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and the case is remanded.
I
Dyno is a Delaware corporation doing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lincoln Industrial, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Olin Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Matteson v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003