Legal Opinion

Love v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1989No. 87-3832PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

871 F.2d 1488

Clinton W. LOVE, Sr., and Rose Mary Love, husband and wife,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of

Agriculture; Farmers Home Administration; Philip A. Young;

Claude Hargrove; Arthur E. Lung; Theodore Hebnes; Roger

Meredith; Rodger Vanvalkenburg; Dale Gilbert; Jim Walker;

Stanley Faught, and Gilbert L. Anderson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3832.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 4, 1988.

Decided April 6, 1989.

Order Staying Mandate May 4, 1989.

Robert M. Kampfer, Gene A. Picotte, P.C., Clancy, Mont., for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sosa v. HiraokaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Bennett v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Bronster v. YoshinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Right to Know Committee v. City CouncilHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API