Legal Opinion
Mejia v. Castle Hotel, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1996No. 95 Civ. 1692 (JES)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*344MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thelma Mejia brings the instant action against Castle Hotel, Inc. (“Castle Hotel”) and Local 144, Hotel and Allied Service Employees Union (“Local 144”), alleging breach of a collective bargaining agreement and breach of the duty of fair representation. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), Castle Hotel and Local 144 (collectively “defendants”) move to dismiss the instant action for failure to serve process within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(m) and 6(b),…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Enron Oil Corp. v. DiakuharaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Joan Cody v. Keith Mello and Thomas MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Denise McGregor Individually and as of the Estate of Roy McGregor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Darden v. Daimlerchrysler North America Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Jones v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- AIG Managed Market Neutral Fund v. Askin Capital ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Bang v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Goodstein v. Bombardier Capital, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.