Legal Opinion

Paxton v. City of Montebello

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 18, 2010No. Case CV 09-3691-RCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEEDINGS: (1) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

On February 17, 2010, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion and motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment, a supporting memorandum of points and authorities, a separate statement of uncontroverted facts, and several supporting declarations, and defendant City of Montebello (“City”) filed a notice of motion…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paxton v. City of MontebelloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. Jackson v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API