Paxton v. City of Montebello
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: (1) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROSALYN M. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On February 17, 2010, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion and motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment, a supporting memorandum of points and authorities, a separate statement of uncontroverted facts, and several supporting declarations, and defendant City of Montebello (“City”) filed a notice of motion…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Philomene Long, Surviving Spouse and Heir-At-Law of John Thomas Idlet, Deceased v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paxton v. City of MontebelloDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Jackson v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019