Visor v. Sprint/United Management Co.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This employment discrimination action is before me on the motion of Defendant Sprint/United Management Company (“Sprint”) to dismiss Plaintiffs’ state law claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel and outrageous conduct, as well as the claims of Plaintiffs Farrar and Williams for Title VII retaliation. I grant the motion to dismiss the claim for outrageous conduct, but deny the motion in all other respects.
Sprint offers three arguments in support of its Motion to Dismiss. First, Sprint argues Plaintiffs’ state law claims are subsumed or preempted by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Vicki H. Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Stewart v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Katz v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Atsepoyi v. Tandy Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Christen-Loper v. Bret's Electric, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Clay v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Emerson v. Wembley USA Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.