Legal Opinion

Algeri v. Tonini

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1958No. Civ. 17599PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the defendants for the judicial foreclosure of a deed of trust and for a deficiency judgment if the proceeds from the sale were insufficient to pay plaintiff’s claim. The trial court granted this relief. Milton and Bertha Tonini appeal. Their sole contention is that the deed of trust in question was a purchase money deed of trust and that, under the provisions of section 580b of the Code of Civil Procedure, no prospective deficiency judgment should have been allowed.

The issue as to whether or not this was a purchase money deed of trust was not presented…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Sketchley v. LipkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Peterson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Rabbitt v. Carthage Marble Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jones v. KvistadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Apra v. AureguyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Reimel v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. People v. One 1959 Plymouth SedanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API