Legal Opinion
Lauria v. Soriano
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1960No. Civ. 24160PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order confirming an award of arbitrators and denying plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the award (Code Civ. Proc., § 1293; 3 Witkin on California Procedure, § 16, pp. 2159-2160).
On June 13, 1956, plaintiffs Lew Lauria and Maybelle Lauria, as owners, and defendant Raphael Soriano, as architect, entered into a written contract whereby Soriano agreed to perform architectural services in connection with the construction of a residence for the Laurias. The architect’s compensation was fixed at 12% per cent of the cost of the worh, but the instrument is silent upon maximum cost…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Utah Construction Co. v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Luster v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. BailesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Carolina-Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Rodrigues v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.