Legal Opinion

Whittemore v. Walter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1916No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Case by Ira H. Whittemore against Lewis Walter for malicious prosecution. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for $200 against defendant in an action for malicious prosecution arising from the latter having made complaint and caused plaintiff’s arrest under a criminal charge of fraudulently disposing of five hogs covered by a chattel mortgage he had given defendant, with intent to injure and defraud.

On November 21, 1914, defendant, Walter, who was the tenant on a farm in Saginaw county owned by a Mr. Hoffman, sold to plaintiff, Whittemore, a half interest in certain live stock, tools, hay, grain, ensilage, *367etc., located on the Hoffman farm, surrendering to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. WoodfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Peterson v. TonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Webster v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Rivers v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Deyo v. Detroit Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Rivers v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API