Legal Opinion

Harris v. Woodford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. Eeversed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment for $215 against the defendant in an action for malicious prosecution.

The plaintiff was local agent of the Farmers' Friend Manufacturing Company, an Ohio corporation, and the defendant, who was general agent of the same concern, caused plaintiff's arrest upon a complaint made by him for *149the embezzlement of four grain drills, a harrow, some machinery extras and repairs, and $189.67 in money. Upon the examination the magistrate discharged, the plaintiff. Upon the trial of this cause the court held that there was nothing to show that the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fagnan v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Sharpe v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. Woodworth v. MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Griffin v. ChubbTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Roy v. GoingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Higgins v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Lewis v. Farmer Jack Division, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pawlowski v. JenksMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Steadman v. TophamWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Adkin v. PillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API