Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Toner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Case for assault and battery and malicious prosecution. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.

The plaintiff sued defendant in the Muskegon circuit court, in an action on the case for assault and battery and malicious prosecution, arid recovered a judgment before a jury for $100 on the former charge, and $70 on the latter.

The parties were neighboring farmers, living in the township of Dalton, in Muskegon county. They had not been good friends, but had had difficulty on different •occasions, running back over a period of three years and over. On Sunday, November 18, 1888, the plaintiff ■started to cross defendant's premises, entering them from the highway through a gate, which he left…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rankin v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lambrecht v. SchreyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Davis v. McMillanMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Shea v. Cloquet Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Leech v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Frick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API