Legal Opinion
Bondulich v. O. E. Anderson Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 1962No. Civ. 19960PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHOEMAKER, J.—
This is an appeal by defendants 0. E. Anderson Company, 0. E. Anderson and Florence Anderson, individually and as co-partners of said company, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Roy Bondulich.
The facts are substantially without dispute. On December 2, 1957, the plaintiff, Roy Bondulich, was injured during the course of his employment as a hod carrier for the Knowles Plastering Company. He was working on the building of a new wing for the San Jose Hospital. The general contractor was the 0. E. Anderson Company. The Knowles Plastering Company and the San Jose Steel Company were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hundley v. St. Francis HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Abbott v. CavalliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Griott v. GamblinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Sumrall v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Henninger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Diamond Springs Lime Co. v. American River ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.