Legal Opinion
Vivadent (USA), Inc. v. Darby Dental Supply Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 19, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-1297PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARKSON S. FISHER, Chief Judge.
Defendants move, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a), to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds that venue has been improperly placed, and alternatively, to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. By stipulation of the moving party, this matter is decided on the basis of the papers submitted, in accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons herein stated, defendants’ motions are granted and this action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Houston Fearless Corporation v. Guy TeterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- NCR Credit Corp. v. Ye Seekers Horizon, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- National Property Investors VIII v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Eason v. Linden Avionics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. ExxonMobil Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Scott Paper Co. v. Nice-Pak Products, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.