Legal Opinion

Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 20, 1928No. 26,634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendants appealed from an order sustaining' a demurrer to their answers.

■ Defendant corporation owns timber in northern Minnesota, including some in plaintiff townships. For years it has been engaged in cutting and hauling its timber. It owns and uses in its business a private logging railroad which extends from International Falls, where it manufactures forest products, to about 100 miles into the forest. Such railroad has always crossed highways. Meeting-opposition in plaintiff townships, the company made application to the board of county commissioners for a permit pursuant to L. 1927,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. EmmersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Hoey v. . GilroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willoughby v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API