Legal Opinion

Brunette v. Vulcan Materials Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 15, 1970No. Gen. 53,467PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

Plaintiffs seek to obtain specific performance of an alleged contract to convey a parcel of real estate or in the alternative to recover damages for breach of contract. Defendants moved to dismiss the suit pursuant to sections 45 and 48 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill Rev Stats, c 110, §§ 45, 48 (1967)). As to section 45 defendants contend that the complaint does not state a cause of action and as to section 48, that the claim is barred by the Statute of Frauds. The trial court sustained defendants’ motion and dismissed the suit and plaintiffs have appealed. The facts follow.

In 1956 plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. ChastekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. People ex rel. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Whitelaw v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Calo, Inc. v. AMF Pinspotters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
  5. Byron v. ByronIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Ceres Illinois, Inc. v. Illinois Scrap Processing, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Shelly Feldman, Individually and D/B/A Shelly Feldman Associates v. Allegheny International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Interway, Inc. v. AlagnaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Gagnon v. SchickelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Runnemede Owners, Inc., and Ranjit S. Ghura v. Crest Mortgage Corporation and Steven M. RaymanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API