Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of David

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 1, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant had been a practicing attorney in his native India prior to emigrating to this country and finding work as a legal secretary in the employer law firm. When it came to the employer’s attention that claimant was handling legal matters for various individuals as an “attorney in fact”, leaving instructions to call him at the employer’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re the Claim of MeleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API