Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Cattan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 12, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 30, 1991, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
When claimant’s employer called claimant on the telephone to find out why he had missed several days of work in the preceding three weeks, claimant informed his employer that he would not come back to work unless he was given a $2,500 loan and a $100 a week raise. The employer refused to comply with claimant’s demand. The employer informed claimant to do…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re the Claim of WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re the Claim of ChassmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of DeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Claim of KeefeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of KilgallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of Di FebboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of NaughtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.