Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Steubenville City Schools
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2004No. 03-4373PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeith, J., joined by Martin, J.,
ROGERS, J. (pp. 974-76), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Steubenville City Schools, Superintendent Richard Luc-ci, in his individual capacity only, and Board Members, Daniel Spahn, Ruth Ann Bruzzese, William Kerr, William Hendricks, and Richard Beal, in their official capacities only, appeal the district court’s denial of qualified immunity in this action claiming a deprivation of plaintiffs First and Fourteenth Amendment rights in defendants’ failure to offer plaintiff a permanent teaching position. For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Jenkins v. Rock Hill Local School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen FournierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Talley v. Brentwood Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Rose v. Saginaw CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.