Legal Opinion
Roth v. Snider
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1946No. 29913PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
Action, in the present case, was instituted by plaintiffs to compel specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. After trial upon the merits, the court entered its decree of specific performance. Defendants then appealed to this court.
Their assignments of error are: holding an option in the contract under consideration as absolute and not conditional; holding the contract to be equitable and enforcible; and in not dismissing plaintiffs’ case.
The material facts are not in serious dispute. A brief summation will suffice for the points to be considered. September 22, 1941, appellants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Cloverdale Co. v. LittlefieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Buddenberg v. WelchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
- Chandler & Co. v. McDonald-Weber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- King v. Dalton Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
- Paullus v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.