Legal Opinion
Marcatante v. City of Chicago
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 24, 2011No. 10-2114, 10-2243, 10-2814, 10-2921PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs are retired City of Chicago employees who were members of several trade unions. They were offered incentives to retire early under an Early Retirement Incentive Program (ERIP) and did so in early 2004 while their unions were still negotiating new Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) for the 2003-2007 period. During the negotiation process, the 1999-2003 CBAs governed the parties’ relationships. In 2005, after two years of negotiations, the City and unions agreed to make raises retroactive to July 2003, but only for current employees, employees laid off…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Argyropoulos v. City of AltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Julie Boumehdi v. Plastag Holdings, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Tatum C. Singletary v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Village of Bloomingdale v. CDG Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Clarisha Benson v. Fannie May Confections BrandsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Andreea Gociman v. Loyola University of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Omar Hernandez v. Illinois Institute of TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
- Nathaniel Pryor v. Michael CorriganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Driver v. AppleIllinois, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.