Legal Opinion

People v. Harris

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1971No. Docket 7886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s jury trial on a charge of felonious assault, MCLA § 750.82 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.277), resulted in his conviction of the offense charged. He was sentenced, his motions for new trial on the basis of prejudicial remarks to the jury by the prosecutor and newly-discovered evidence were denied, and he appeals. The appeal raises two issues: (1) should the trial court have granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on the basis of prejudicial remarks to the jury by the prosecutor?; and (2) should the trial court have granted defendant’s motion for a new trial on the basis of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. SmallwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. KeiswetterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. People v. BaumanMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. DaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. MiniearMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. BersineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. People v. PomrankyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. AlexanderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. PulleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API