People v. Dailey
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, P. J.
Defendant was convicted by jury verdict of armed robbery. His motion for new trial was denied and he appeals from the conviction and sentence and the denial of his motion for new trial.
Defendant raises 4 questions for review, but 2 of them, namely:
“Was defendant denied a fair trial because of prejudicial comment and conduct of the trial court?”
“Was the trial court abusive of its discretion in limiting the scope of the voir dire examination?”
were not raised in the trial court and they cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. People v. Will (1966), 3 Mich App 330. The 2 questions properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. BarrowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. SmallwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. VasquezMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. WillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. CanterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HaveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.