Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 19, 1951No. 10399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This litigation represents an attempt on the part of the Southern Pacific Railroad to collect some unpaid freight charges from the United States. Suit is brought.under the Tucker Act. 1 Plaintiff won in the District Court and the government here seeks to persuade us that the decision is wrong. There is no controversy as to what happened. The disagreement comes as to the legal consequences of the stipulated facts.

In 1946 Army authorities declared obsolete a group of truck trailers known as ^Athey-Wagons” which were located at the Army’s Mount Rainier Ordnance Depot.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Minnesota Mutual Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. California Powder Works v. Atlantic & Pacific R.R.California Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Schlenz v. John Deere Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1981
  3. United States v. BethkeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1955
  4. Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API