Legal Opinion

People v. Margolies

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eve Preminger, J.

Do the rights afforded an individual by Massiah v United States (377 US 201) and People v Hobson (39 NY2d 479) ever expire? The defendant argues that an incarcerated person never loses his right to counsel once it has attached and that admissions made to informants while in prison which link him to a string of contract murders are inadmissible at trial.

FINDINGS OF FACT

On November 2, 1982 the defendant, admitting to schemes and swindles perpetrated against John P. Maguire and Co. and the United States Government, pleaded guilty to mail fraud and tax evasion…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Barbera v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Barbera v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. GirouardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API