Yocum v. United States Internal Revenue Service
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant United States of America’s motion to dismiss the petition to quash summonses, filed January 24, 1984. This court gave petitioners twenty (20) days in which to respond. Petitioners responded. The United States has made a further reply. For the following reasons, respondent’s motion to dismiss will be granted.
The procedure for filing a petition to quash summons of the Internal Revenue Service to third parties is clearly set forth in 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2):
(A) Notwithstanding any other law or rule of law, any person who is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- McTaggart v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- James Coleman, Jr. v. The United States of America, Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Riggs v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dame v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union Local 54 v. ReadDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Dorsey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Maikranz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.