Legal Opinion
Dame v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 1986No. 86 Civ. 2489 (EW)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Petitioner Joe F. Dame on March 26, 1986, filed a motion to quash two Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summonses issued to the Chase Manhattan Bank (Chase) and Citibank. In April 1986, Chase mailed information to the IRS in response to its summons. An IRS official, unaware of Chase's response, on July 16, 1986 mailed letters to Chase and Citibank releasing them from their obligation to respond. Based on these releases, the IRS moves for an order dismissing Dame’s motion to quash as moot. Dame now supplements his original motion to quash with a motion to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- George M. Stringer v. United States of America, and Ira G. Chambless, Internal Revenue Agent, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- McTaggart v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
- Riggs v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Bilodeau v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
- Franklin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Fisheries Inc. v. United States of America, Konstantin Vladimirovich Voloshenko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Cosme v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Fisher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
- Garvin v. CohenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022
- In re Domi Publications, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.