Legal Opinion

Derrickson v. Commissioners of Harrington

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 7, 1927No. 20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The demurrer admits the truth of all facts properly pleaded.

It, therefore, admits the allegations in the first count that the defendant operated a water pumping plant in the town of Harrington and employed the plaintiff to work for it in and about said plant; that the said plaintiff was unskilled in the use of machinery and ignorant of the dangers thereof; that without any specific instructions as to such dangers he was ordered by the defendant to wipe the dirt, dust and grease from certain gear wheels thereof while the said engine and gear…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Atlas Engine Works v. RandallIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Wescott v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Becker v. BaumgartnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Gorman v. Des Moines Brick Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Girdler Corp. v. Delaware Compressed Gas Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1936
  2. Hendrickson v. Continental Fibre Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1927
  3. Stucker v. American Stores Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1932
  4. Culver v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  5. Gregory Co. v. Bailey's Adm'r.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API