Legal Opinion

Hiner v. Deere and Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 20, 2003No. 01-3335PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a product-liability suit governed by Kansas law. Plaintiff Arvine Hiner suffered injuries in a farming accident involving a tractor and front-end loader manufactured by Defendant Deere and Company. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that the tractor and loader were defective in design and that Deere failed to issue adequate warnings concerning risks posed by the equipment. The district court granted Deere’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. Background

We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Burnette v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Martinez v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Sta-Rite Industries, Inc. v. LeveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  4. Chairez v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Baughn v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API